[post_page_title]Might be a direct link there[/post_page_title]
So… People hunted deer, and consequently there were fewer deer to be found? Is that what you’re telling us here? Is… Is that what passes for news these days? We’re sorry for all the rhetorical questions, but we’re kind of dumbstruck by how useless this headline makes the article out to be.
Maybe this is an issue locally, where the deer population might be in danger, but it’s doing no one any good to frame it like that. What’s next, “Man takes a bath with plugged-in toaster, it doesn’t end well”?
Pages: Page 1, Page 2, Page 3, Page 4, Page 5, Page 6, Page 7, Page 8, Page 9, Page 10, Page 11, Page 12, Page 13, Page 14, Page 15, Page 16, Page 17, Page 18, Page 19, Page 20, Page 21, Page 22, Page 23, Page 24, Page 25, Page 26, Page 27, Page 28, Page 29, Page 30, Page 31, Page 32, Page 33, Page 34, Page 35, Page 36, Page 37, Page 38, Page 39, Page 40
